<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Justinology<title> &#187; Colorado Politics</title>
</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justinology.org/category/categories/colorado-feed/colorado-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justinology.org</link>
	<description>Thoughts and opinions from the Rocky Mountains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Colorado Tea Party on Facebook Seems to Want to Advance the “Birther Agenda.”  Seriously?</title>
		<link>http://justinology.org/2010/07/26/colorado-tea-party-facebook-advance-birther-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://justinology.org/2010/07/26/colorado-tea-party-facebook-advance-birther-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinology.org/?p=2900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is my theory that the crazies from the two main political parties come out in full force when their party doesn&#8217;t hold the Presidency. As a result, I&#8217;ve kept a little distance between myself and any tea party groups/gatherings (I attended one on 4/15/09, but that&#8217;s it). I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re gatherings of racists, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my theory that the crazies from the two main political parties come out in full force when their party doesn&#8217;t hold the Presidency.  As a result, I&#8217;ve kept a little distance between myself and any tea party groups/gatherings (I attended one on 4/15/09, but that&#8217;s it).  I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re gatherings of racists, though like any large gathering of any kind, there are probably some racists there.  Mostly, I try to steer clear of kooks and conspiracy theorists.</p>
<p>Case in point:  Ken Buck, a Republican running for U.S. Senate in Colorado, was recently caught saying, &#8220;will you tell those dumbasses at the Tea Party to stop asking questions about birth certificates while I&#8217;m on the camera?&#8221;  Full story, including Mr. Buck&#8217;s response to the fallout, can be found <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/election2010/ci_15600796" title="Senate hopeful Buck regrets criticism of Tea Party birthers (Denver Post)" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>From there, it&#8217;s getting a little weird.  The <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Colorado-Tea-Party/130603343626683" target="_blank">Colorado Tea Party Facebook page</a>, which claims to be,</p>
<blockquote><p>The Official Colorado Tea Party Page.</p>
<p>Standing on the Judeo-Christian Principles of the United States Constitution. </p>
<p>The central hub for Colorado Activists who, uncompromisingly, work to reclaim Colorado&#8217;s family values and America&#8217;s Greatness.</p></blockquote>
<p>posted the following this morning:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://justinology.org/images/kenbuckoriginal.jpg" title="Colorado Tea Party on Facebook Seems to Want to Advance the “Birther Agenda.”  Seriously?" alt="kenbuckoriginal Colorado Tea Party on Facebook Seems to Want to Advance the “Birther Agenda.”  Seriously?" /></center></p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice that I had to grab it from my Hootsuite feed, as it was deleted within 5 minutes <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Colorado-Tea-Party/130603343626683?v=wall#!/pages/Colorado-Tea-Party/130603343626683?v=wall&#038;story_fbid=134808196554263&#038;ref=mf" target="_blank">and replaced with</a>:</p>
<p><center><img src="http://justinology.org/images/kenbuckrevised.jpg" title="Colorado Tea Party on Facebook Seems to Want to Advance the “Birther Agenda.”  Seriously?" alt="kenbuckrevised Colorado Tea Party on Facebook Seems to Want to Advance the “Birther Agenda.”  Seriously?" /></center></p>
<p>So, my question becomes: is this group run by birthers, sympathetic to birthers, or is this just a case of bad communication?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justinology.org/2010/07/26/colorado-tea-party-facebook-advance-birther-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seriously, Mr. Tancredo?</title>
		<link>http://justinology.org/2010/07/12/seriously-mr-tancredo/</link>
		<comments>http://justinology.org/2010/07/12/seriously-mr-tancredo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Colorado Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[border security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Tancredo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justinology.org/?p=2864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is Obama the biggest threat facing America?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, there was a point in time where a pretty large group of people wanted to &#8220;draft&#8221; Thomas Tancredo to run for governor of Colorado.  Tancredo passed on that, choosing instead to tour the country <a href="http://cbs4denver.com/local/tom.tancredo.Western.2.1799092.html" target="_blank" title="Tancredo Wants Obama Impeached Over Borders (CBS 4 Denver)">making outrageous claims against the President</a>.</p>
<p>Now, don&#8217;t get me wrong, I think something needs to be done about the <strong>illegal </strong>immigration issue, and President Obama&#8217;s increase in executive and overall federal government power needs to be reversed.  However, I cannot stand behind Tancredo.  This is the type of &#8220;lunatic fringe&#8221; speech that paints us all in a bad light.  Tancredo is a big name, and that big name representing the &#8220;crazier&#8221; side of the conservative/libertarian contingent will get more press than anyone else.  It makes us all look bad, and I don&#8217;t really care to be lumped in with that contingent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justinology.org/2010/07/12/seriously-mr-tancredo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
